Culturally Wetland Responsive Teaching to Improve Science Literacy and Wasaka Character

Syahmani Syahmani(1), Rilia Iriani(2), Muhammad Kusasi(3), Yogo Dwi Prasetyo(4), Hakki Norhasanah(5), Nur Farhana Abdul Rahman(6),


(1) Chemistry Education Study Program, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(2) Chemistry Education Study Program, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(3) Chemistry Education Study Program, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(4) Chemistry Education Study Program, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(5) Chemistry Education Study Program, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(6) School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia

Abstract

Chemistry students still have low levels of scientific literacy, although in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 and the transition to Society 5.0, students need these skills. An alternative for raising students' scientific literacy and character is the Culturally Wetland Responsive Teaching (CWRT) approach. This developmental research tested the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of e-modules based on CWRT for the colligative properties of solutions. The ADDIE development model was used for the research method. Both test and non-test instruments were used for data collection. The e-module was tested on 23 students from grades A1 and A2 in the Chemistry Education Study Program at a public university in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. The analysis showed that the e-modules were highly valid regarding content, presentation, language, and media feasibility. They were also highly practical in individual and small group tests, limited trials, and assessing lecturers' ability to use e-modules and manage classes. The modules were effective, as evidenced by the N-gain value of science literacy competence and the wasaka character of students in the high category. The results suggest that e-modules based on Culturally Wetland Responsive Teaching are valid, practical, and effective for teaching the colligative properties of solutions.

Keywords

E-module based on Culturally Wetland Responsive Teaching, science literacy, wasaka character

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abidin, A. M. (2018). Ekstrakurikuler melalui metode pembiasaan. Didaktika Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(2), 183–196.

Adawiyah, R., Andayani, Y., Rudyat, L., & Savalas, T. (2022). Pengembangan modul kimia etnosains terintegrasi model culturally responsive transformative teaching (CRTT). Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(4), 123–128.

Alameddine, N. (2021). Supporting Muslim students through culturally relevant, responsive, and sustaining pedagogies. Canadian Social Studies, 52(2), 22–38.

Amini, A., Yurnita, S., & Hasnidar, H. (2017). The development of character education model through an integrated curriculum at elementary education level in Medan City. International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies, 1(2), 298–311.

Annisa, M., Kosasih, A., & Shofina, N. (2022). Needs analysis of wasaka character assessment instruments (religious & hard work) in learning in elementary schools. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(5), 1706–1711.

Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Misconceptions in chemistry (Addressing perceptions in chemical education). Sense Publisher.

Benawa, A., Building, C., Benawa, J., Building, C., & Program, M. C. (2020). Personal mental toughness as character. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(4), 1658–1662.

Berlian, Z., & Huda, M. (2022). Reflecting culturally responsive and communicative teaching (CRCT) through partnership commitment. Education Sciences, 12(5), 1–20.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Library of Congress.

Cheng, M. M., Lacaste, A. V., Saranza, C., & Chuang, H. H. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching in technology-supported learning environments in marine education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(24), 13922.

Chitpin, S., & Karoui, O. (2021). Culturally responsive pedagogy: A Canadian perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 2(1), 45–62.

Choden, T. (2020). Blending problem-based learning with scientific argumentation to enhance students' understanding of basic genetics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 445–462.

Cortes, A. E. (2023). Using online video observations and real time, peer reflective analysis of culturally responsive teaching pedagogy in a university teacher preparatory program for preservice teachers [Doctoral dissertation, George Fox University]. Digital Commons @ George Fox University. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/edd/214

Davis, J., & Allen, K. (2020). Culturally responsive mentoring and instruction for middle school Black boys in STEM programs. Journal of African American Males in Education, 11(2), 43–58.

Dewi, C. A., Khery, Y., & Erna, M. (2019). An ethnoscience study in chemistry learning to develop scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 279–287.

Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2020). Fostering complex problem solving for diverse learners: Engaging an ethos of intentionality toward equitable access. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 679–702.

Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Han, H. S., Vomvoridi-Ivanovi?, E., Jacobs, J., Karanxha, Z., Lypka, A., Topdemir, C., & Feldman, A. (2014). Culturally responsive pedagogy in higher education: A collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 10(3), 290–312.

Hartutik, Rusdarti, & Sumaryanto, S. (2017). Integrating character education model with spiral system in chemistry subject. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 6(1), 1–5. IOP Publishing.

Haryani, S., Prasetya, A. T., & Bahron, H. (2017). Building the character of preservice teachers through the learning model of problem-based analytical chemistry lab work. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 229–236.

Hoffman, D. L., Leong, P., Pi, R., Ka, H., & Paek, S. (2022). Teachers' perspectives on culturally relevant computing: Principles and processes. TechTrends, 66(5), 423–435.

Hutchison, L., & McAlister-Shields, L. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching: Its application in higher education environments. Education Sciences, 10(124), 1–12.

Isa, I. M. M., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2022). Bridging culture and science education: Implications for research and practice. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 362–380.

Iyamuremye, A., Mukiza, J., Nsengimana, T., Kampire, E., Sylvain, H., & Nsabayezu, E. (2023). Knowledge construction in chemistry through web-based learning strategy: A synthesis of literature. Educational and Information Technologies, 28, 5585–5604.

Kahler, J., Hahn, I., Koller, O., & Hahn, I. (2020). The development of early scientific literacy gaps in kindergarten children. International Journal of Science Education, 42(12), 1988–2007.

Kaukko, M., Alisaari, J., Heikkola, L. M., & Haswell, N. (2022). Migrant-background student experiences of facing and overcoming difficulties in Finnish comprehensive schools. Education Sciences, 12(450), 1–16.

Kusumah, R. G. T., Walid, A., Sugiharta, I., Putra, E. P., Wicaksono, I., & Erfan, M. (2020). Construction of high school chemistry module based on problem-based learning (PBL) on salt hydrolysis material for gifted students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 1–14.

Laksono, P. J. (2018). Studi kemampuan literasi kimia mahasiswa pendidikan kimia pada materi pengelolaan limbah. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(1), 1–12.

Leonard, H. C. (2021). Culturally relevant and responsive pedagogy in computing: A quick scoping review. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 5(2), 1–11.

Lloyd, N. J., Lewthwaite, B. E., Osborne, B., Boon, H. J., & Boon, H. (2015). Effective teaching practices for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students: A review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Research, 40(11), 38–58.

Maryono, Sinulingga, K., & Sirait, R. (2021). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika berbasis kultur budaya Jawa melalui pendekatan culturally responsive teaching. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 13–24.

Maydiantoro, A. (2021). Research model development: Brief literature review. Jurnal Pengembangan Profesi Pendidik Indonesia, 1(2), 29–35.

Mentari, N., Nindiasari, H., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir reflektif siswa SMP berdasarkan gaya belajar. NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 69.

Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2017). Knowledge organization through multiple representations in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 638–653.

Nashihin, H. (2019). Konstruksi budaya sekolah sebagai wadah internalisasi nilai karakter. At-Tajdid: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah, 8(1), 131–149.

Novak, E., & Khan, J. I. (2022). A research-practice partnership approach for co-designing a culturally responsive computer science curriculum for upper elementary students. TechTrends, 66, 527–538.

Pagan, O. (2022). A multilevel framework of racism as a barrier to teachers’ implementation of culturally relevant pedagogy. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–14.

Polman, J., Hornstra, L., & Volman, M. (2021). The meaning of meaningful learning in mathematics in upper-primary education. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 469–486.

Rahmawati, Y., Ridwan, A., Cahyana, U., & Febriana, D. (2020). The integration of culturally responsive transformative teaching to enhance student cultural identity in the chemistry classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 468–476.

Rahmawati, Y., Ridwan, A., Rahman, A., & Kurniadewi, F. (2019). Chemistry students’ identity empowerment through ethnochemistry in culturally responsive transformative teaching (CRTT). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1156(1).

Ramsay-Jordan, N. (2020). Preparation and the real world of education: How prospective teachers grapple with using culturally responsive teaching practices in the age of standardized testing. International Journal of Educational Reform, 29(1), 3–24.

Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (2013). Mastering the instructional design process. Pfeiffer.

Ruparel, N. (2020). Mental toughness: Promising new paradigms for the workplace. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 3–8.

Rusek, M., Vojir, K., Bartova, I., Kleckova, M., Sirotek, V., & Strofova, J. (2022). To what extent do freshmen university chemistry students master chemistry calculations? Acta Chimica, 69, 371–377.

Sari, E. N., Miriam, S., & Suyidno. (2023). Developing students’ scientific literacy skills in driving schools through the use of local wisdom-based physics lesson e-module. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 9–19.

Schirmer, B. R., & Lockman, A. S. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching in an undergraduate online general education course. Online Learning Journal, 26(3), 132–148.

Selles, N. H., Carril, P. C. M., & Sanmamed, M. G. (2020). Interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the implementation phase. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 27.

Shaffer, J. F., Ferguson, J., & Denaro, K. (2019). Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills reveals that fundamental literacy is an important contributor to scientific literacy. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 18(3), 31.

Suh, E., Hoffman, L., & Zollman, A. (2022). Broadening conceptions of STEM learning: STEM smart skills and school-based multilingual family engagement. Science & Mathematics Education, 25(4), 95–106.

Suharti, L., & Kurniawati, R. P. (2023). Mental toughness and competitive performance of Indonesian hotel supervisors. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 10.

Sutrisno, H., Wahyudiati, D., Supiah, I., & Louise, Y. (2020). Ethnochemistry in the chemistry curriculum in higher education: Exploring chemistry learning resources in Sasak local wisdom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A), 7833–7842.

Suwignyo, H., & Saryono, D. (2019). Examining the implementation of culturally responsive teaching materials (CRTM) of Sasak culture literature using culturally responsive teaching (CRT). International Journal of Humanities and Innovation, 2(1), 13–20.

Syahmani, I., Iriani, R., Riana, S., & Bakti, I. (2022). E-magazine development with social emotional learning approach on colloid material in context of local wisdom. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 7(2), 289–304.

Syahmani, Leny, & Iriani, R. (2020). Computer-supported collaborative learning-retrosynthetic analysis model to improve students' problem-solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1), 012–014.

Syahmani, P., Prasetyo, Y. D. W. I., Warohmah, A., Raidimas, M. N., Sopranti, N., & Mustarianti, L. (2023). Exploration and design of Etno-STEM as a learning source in phytochemistry to improve metacognitive skills and students’ higher order thinking skills of environmental problems. Journal of Wetlands Environmental Management, 11(2), 108–125.

Syahmani, Suyono, & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2020). Effectiveness of i-SMART learning model using chemistry problem-solving in senior high school to improve metacognitive skills and students’ conceptual understanding. Pedagogika, 138(2), 37–60.

Talanquer, V. (2022). The complexity of reasoning about and with chemical representations. JACS Au, 2, 2658–2669.

Tanase, M. F. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching in urban secondary schools. Education and Urban Society, 54(4), 363–388.

Virginanti, M., Rahmawati, Y., & Kurniadewi, F. (2019). Social emotional learning in chemistry learning: Group investigation and contextual learning integration to develop student’s social emotional competencies. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 4(1), 7–16.

Wati, M., Rif, M. F., & Prastika, D. (2018). Pengembangan petunjuk praktikum fisika dasar I berbasis 5M untuk melatih keterampilan proses sains dan karakter Wasaka. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah, 6(1), 26–30.

Widayoko, A., Femilia, P. S., Lesmono, A. D., Sudjatmi, H., Prastiwi, V. D., & Munfarikha, N. (2019). Description of students’ scientific literacy competencies on the scientific issue of. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 31–38.

Widiantari, N. K. K., Suparta, I. N., & Sariyasa. (2022). Meningkatkan literasi numerasi dan pendidikan karakter dengan e-modul bermuatan etnomatematika. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 10(2), 331–343.

Wina, D. R., Hindarto, N., Priyono, A., & Prasetyo, B. (2017). Studi kasus pendekatan saintifik dalam pembelajaran IPA pada kurikulum 2013 di SMP Negeri 5 Semarang. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(1), 1–12.

Winarti, A., Almubarak, & Saadi, P. (2022). Pengembangan bahan ajar transformative learning berbasis gaya belajar untuk meningkatkan kemandirian belajar di era COVID-19. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah, 7(1), 74–82.

Winarti, A., Almubarak, Saadi, P., Ijirana, Aminah, S., & Ratman. (2022). Culturally responsive chemistry teaching (CRCT) of college students as a novice teacher: Does it matter? JTK: Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 7(2), 175–189.

Wiyarsi, A., Pratomon, H., & Priyambodo, E. (2020). Vocational high school students' chemical literacy on context-based learning: A case of petroleum topic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 147–161.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats