Utilization of Web-Facilitated Learning to Improve Teacher Skills in Identifying Basic Competencies

Moh. Rifqi Rahman(1), Bina Prima Panggayuh(2), Evi Fatimatur Rusydiyah(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i2.87


(1) STAI Al-Azhar Menganti Gresik, Indonesia
(2) UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
(3) UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

The use of technology has the potential to build more intensive learning and make it easier for teachers to carry out student learning assessments. The present study was aimed to analyze the extent of the benefits of web-facilitated learning as a form of technology product to grow teacher skills incorrectly identifying basic competencies. This study surveyed the activities of the Islamic Religious Education Teacher Working Group (KKG) in Surabaya and analyzes it using the Miles and Huberman model. The results showed that the use of web-based facilitated learning in this study is quite effective. This was based on five main factors, namely usability 83%, usefulness of content 86%, adequacy of information 87%, accessibility 82%, and interaction 81%. The total average score was 83% and shows very good quality. Several issues regarding the barriers to implementation were discussed.

Keywords

web-facilitated learning, assessment, learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., Acosta, T., & Salvador-Ullauri, L. (2018). Toward a Combined Method for Evaluation of Web Accessibility. In Ã. Rocha & T. Guarda (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology & Systems (ICITS 2018) (Vol. 721, pp. 602–613). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_57

Alioon, Y., & Delialioğlu, Ö. (2019). The effect of authentic m-learning activities on student engagement and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 655–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12559

Alqahtani, A. (2019). Usability testing of Google cloud applications: Students’ perspective. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 326. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.585

Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and Challenges of Using e-Assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Tindakan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Barak, M. (2017). Cloud Pedagogy: Utilizing Web-Based Technologies for the Promotion of Social Constructivist Learning in Science Teacher Preparation Courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(5), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9691-3

Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Albayrak Sari, A., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Investigating the impact of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers’ TPACK: The impact of teacher education strategies on TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12565

Barbosa Neves, B., Franz, R., Judges, R., Beermann, C., & Baecker, R. (2019). Can Digital Technology Enhance Social Connectedness Among Older Adults? A Feasibility Study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817741369

Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12439

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Campante, F., Durante, R., & Sobbrio, F. (2018). Politics 2.0: The Multifaceted Effect of Broadband Internet on Political Participation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(4), 1094–1136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx044

Dalby, D., & Swan, M. (2019). Using digital technology to enhance formative assessment in mathematics classrooms: Using digital technology in formative assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12606

Dawson, P., & Henderson, M. (2017). How Does Technology Enable Scaling Up Assessment for Learning? In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (pp. 209–222). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_14

Deeley, S. J. (2018). Using technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1356906

Dinc, E. (2019). Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions of Barriers to Technology Integration in Education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634187

Dunn, T. J., & Kennedy, M. (2019). Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 137, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.004

Fang, X., & Holsapple, C. W. (2007). An empirical study of web site navigation structures’ impacts on web site usability. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 476–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.004

Galimullina, E., Ljubimova, E., & Ibatullin, R. (2020). SMART education technologies in mathematics teacher education—Ways to integrate and progress that follows integration. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1674137

George, A., & Sanders, M. (2017). Evaluating the potential of teacher-designed technology-based tasks for meaningful learning: Identifying needs for professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2871–2895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9609-y

Güzeller, C. O. (2012). The effect of web-based portfolio use on academic achievement and retention. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(3), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-012-9214-0

Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691

Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., Creely, E., Ceretkova, S., Černochová, M., Sendova, E., Sointu, E. T., & Tienken, C. H. (2018). Creativity and Technology in Education: An International Perspective. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9380-1

Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The need for actionable feedback in assessment literacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(3), 249–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1771665

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

Hummel, H. G. K., Brinke, D. J., Nadolski, R. J., & Baartman, L. K. J. (2017). Content validity of game-based assessment: Case study of a serious game for ICT managers in training. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1192060

Indaryanti, Susanti, E., Aisyah, N., & Scristia. (2019). Analisis Kesesuaian Indikator terhadap Kompetensi Dasar pada Pelajaran Matematika oleh Guru Sekolah Menengah Palembang. Jurnal Gantang, 4(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v4i2.1429

Jääskelä, P., Häkkinen, P., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017). Teacher Beliefs Regarding Learning, Pedagogy, and the Use of Technology in Higher Education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1343691

Joachim, C., Hammann, M., Carstensen, C. H., & Bögeholz, S. (2020). Modeling and Measuring Pre-Service Teachers’ Assessment Literacy Regarding Experimentation Competences in Biology. Education Sciences, 10(5), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050140

Kanishcheva, O., Vysotska, V., Chyrun, L., & Gozhyj, A. (2018). Method of Integration and Content Management of the Information Resources Network. In N. Shakhovska & V. Stepashko (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing II (Vol. 689, pp. 204–216). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70581-1_14

Koh, K. H. (2017). Authentic Assessment. In K. H. Koh, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.22

Kusaeri. (2014). Acuan & Teknik Penilaian Proses & Hasil Belajar dalam Kurikulum 2013. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010

Lam, P., Lam, S. L., Lam, J., & McNaught, C. (2009). Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs: How students’ opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1179

Lam, R. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: Surveying knowledge, conceptions and practices of classroom-based writing assessment in Hong Kong. System, 81, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.006

Larsson Lund, M., Lövgren-engström, A., & Lexell, J. (2011). Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: Experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(5), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.574309

Leung, A. (2020). Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(15), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9

Liang, X., & Creasy, K. (2004). Classroom Assessment in Web-Based Instructional Environment: Instructors’ Experience. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7275/84mr-wp41

Lin, Y.-R., Fan, B., & Xie, K. (2020). The influence of a web-based learning environment on low achievers’ science argumentation. Computers & Education, 151, 103860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103860

Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482

Mercader, C. (2020). Explanatory model of barriers to integration of digital technologies in higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5133–5147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10222-3

Mostafa, M. H., Abdel Aleem, S. H. E., Ali, S. G., Ali, Z. M., & Abdelaziz, A. Y. (2020). Techno-economic assessment of energy storage systems using annualized life cycle cost of storage (LCCOS) and levelized cost of energy (LCOE) metrics. Journal of Energy Storage, 29, 101345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101345

Napanoy, J. B., & Peckley, M. K. (2020). Assessment Literacy of Public Elementary School Teachers in the Indigenous Communities in Northern Philippines. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 5693–5703. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082203

Nassar, B. A. Y. A. (2020). Effect of information quality and system quality in information system success model as an antecedent of mobile learning in education institutions: Case study in Jordan. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2020.108190

Nguyen, D. M., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Allen, G. D. (2006). The Impact of Web-Based Assessment and Practice on Students’ Mathematics Learning Attitudes. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(3), 251–279.

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005

Okada, A., Noguera, I., Alexieva, L., Rozeva, A., Kocdar, S., Brouns, F., Ladonlahti, T., Whitelock, D., & Guerreroâ€Roldán, A. (2019). Pedagogical approaches for eâ€assessment with authentication and authorship verification in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3264–3282. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12733

Own, Z. (2010). The Application of an Adaptive, Web-based Learning Environment on Oxidation-reduction Reactions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-006-9033-z

Palobo, M., & Tembang, Y. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Guru Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di Kota Merauke. Sebatik, 23(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v23i2.775

Potdevin, F., Vors, O., Huchez, A., Lamour, M., Davids, K., & Schnitzler, C. (2018). How can video feedback be used in physical education to support novice learning in gymnastics? Effects on motor learning, self-assessment and motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(6), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1485138

Pradhan, R. P., Mallik, G., & Bagchi, T. P. (2018). Information communication technology (ICT) infrastructure and economic growth: A causality evinced by cross-country panel data. IIMB Management Review, 30(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.01.001

Purnami, W., Sarwanto, S., Suranto, S., Suyanti, R. D., & Mocerino, M. (2021). Investigation of Science Technology Ecocultural Society (STEcS) Model to Enhance Eco Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v2i2.40

Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084

Raymaker, D. M., Kapp, S. K., McDonald, K. E., Weiner, M., Ashkenazy, E., & Nicolaidis, C. (2019). Development of the AASPIRE Web Accessibility Guidelines for Autistic Web Users. Autism in Adulthood, 1(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2018.0020

Regan, K., Evmenova, A. S., Sacco, D., Schwartzer, J., Chirinos, D. S., & Hughes, M. D. (2019). Teacher perceptions of integrating technology in writing. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1561507

Ren, X. (2019). The undefined figure: Instructional designers in the open educational resource (OER) movement in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3483–3500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09940-0

Sangle, S. B., Nandurkar, K. N., & Pawar, P. J. (2020). Incorporating E-Assessment Tools in Teaching for Effective and Authentic Assessment. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 33(0), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150081

Serhan, D. (2019). Web-Based Homework Systems: Students’ Perceptions of Course Interaction and Learning in Mathematics. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 1(2), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.18

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Soffer, T., Kahan, T., & Livne, E. (2017). E-assessment of online academic courses via students’ activities and perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.001

Sudijono, A. (2005). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suwarma, I. R., & Apriyani, S. (2022). Explore Teachers’ Skills in Developing Lesson Plan and Assessment That Oriented on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i2.66

Tokac, U., Novak, E., & Thompson, C. G. (2019). Effects of gameâ€based learning on students’ mathematics achievement: A metaâ€analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12347

Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005

Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology Integration Barriers: Urban School Mathematics Teachers Perspectives. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9230-y

Wang, M., Cheng, B., Chen, J., Mercer, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). The use of web-based collaborative concept mapping to support group learning and interaction in an online environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.003

Wang, T.-H., Kao, C.-H., & Dai, Y.-L. (2019). Developing a web-based multimedia assessment system for facilitating science laboratory instruction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12357

Wang, T.-H., Wang, K.-H., & Huang, S.-C. (2008). Designing a Web-based assessment environment for improving pre-service teacher assessment literacy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.010

Wuryani, W., & Irham, M. (2014). Penilaian dalam Perspektif Kurikulum 2013. INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 19(1), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v19i1.470

Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z., & Zhou, N. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals. Information & Management, 42(4), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(04)00073-4

Yerushalmy, M., Nagari-Haddif, G., & Olsher, S. (2017). Design of tasks for online assessment that supports understanding of students’ conceptions. ZDM, 49(5), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0871-7

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats