Planning Program for Gifted and Talented Students in Madrasa

Aprilis Saputri(1), Syafrimen Syafril(2), Yetri Yetri(3), Rorlinda Yusof(4),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v5i2.1554


(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
(4) PERMATApintar National Gifted Center (International) Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

Abstract

Madrasas support the development of gifted students by integrating general and religious education in a supportive environment. However, discrimination in education policies causes inequality and a lack of support for these students. Thus, special programs are essential for optimal development and career success. This research analyzes the planning of such programs in madrasas using a Systematic Literature Review. Data were collected from 34 documents from reputable scientific journals worldwide and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The findings reveal four key program components: (i) Identification of gifted students using assessment tools, expert teams, and multidimensional evaluation; (ii) Teacher training and professional development focusing on differential teaching strategies, collaborative learning, and partnerships with parents and stakeholders; (iii) Curriculum development including compression and enrichment; (iv) Development of special talents through artistic skills, academic competitions, creative skills, and collaborative activities. This research contributes to better educational policies and practices, ensuring gifted students receive the necessary support to reach their potential and succeed in their future careers.

Keywords

program planning, gifted and talented student, Madrasa

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Anuruthwong, U. (2017). Education for the gifted/talented in Thailand. Cogent Education, 4(1).

Arnstein, K. B., Desmet, O. A., Seward, K., Traynor, A., & Olenchak, F. R. (2023). Underrepresented students in gifted and talented education: Using positive psychology to identify and serve. Education Sciences, 13(9), 955.

Bailey, K. D. (1994). Method of social research. The Free Press.

Batista, T. C. D., Saleme, S. B., Canal, C. P. P., & de Souza, M. L. (2017). Autoconsciência em estudantes talentosos: Um estudo fenomenológico-semiótico. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 21(3), 487–494.

Berman, K. M., Schultz, R. A., & Weber, C. L. (2012). A lack of awareness and emphasis in pre-service teacher training. Gifted Child Today, 35(1), 18–26.

Bettany-Saltikov, J. (2016). How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: A step-by-step guide. McGraw-Hill Education.

Betts, G. T., & Neihart, M. (1986). Implementing self-directed learning models for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(4), 174–177.

Brajcic, M., Kuscevic, D., & Lazeta, M. (2020). A comparison between competencies of teachers and students of teacher education in recognizing artistically gifted students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1327–1336.

Briggs, C. J., Reis, S. M., & Sullivan, E. E. (2008). A national view of promising programs and practices for culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 131–145.

Brown, S. W., & Yakimowski, M. E. (1987). Intelligence scores of gifted students on the WISC-R. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(3), 130–134.

Byrka, M. (2019). Auto-psychological competence of future teachers as a component of professional training and development. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 33(3), 3–5.

Cheung, A. C. K., Shek, D. T. L., Hui, A. N. N., Leung, K. H., & Cheung, R. S. H. (2022). Professional development for teachers of gifted education in Hong Kong: Instrument validation and training effectiveness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15).

Cooper, C. R., Baum, S. M., & Neu, T. W. (2004). Developing scientific talent in students with special needs: An alternative model for identification, curriculum, and assessment. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(4), 162–169.

Cupertino, C. (2007). Differentiating curriculum for gifted students by providing accelerated options. Gifted Education International, 23(1), 19–31.

Demir, S. (2021). Effects of learning style based differentiated activities on gifted students’ creativity. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 9(1), 47–56.

Dettmann, D. F., & Colangelo, N. (1980). A functional model for counseling parents of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(4), 158–161.

Diaz, J., Gusto, C., & Diehl, D. (2017). Developing a program plan based on the program planning cycle. IFAS Extension, 1–6.

Donche, V., De Maeyer, S., Coertjens, L., Van Daal, T., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Differential use of learning strategies in first-year higher education: The impact of personality, academic motivation, and teaching strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 238–251.

Edinger, M. J. (2017). Online teacher professional development for gifted education: Examining the impact of a new pedagogical model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(4), 300–312.

Eguabor, B., & Adeleke, A. M. (2017). Investigating differential learning outcomes of students in physics using animation and textual information teaching strategies in Ondo State secondary school. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 1(2), 1–7.

Elhoweris, H., Alhosani, N., Alsheikh, N., Bacsal, R. M. G., & Bonti, E. (2022). The impact of an enrichment program on the Emirati verbally gifted children. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3).

Fayol, H. (1918). Administration industrielle et générale: Prévision, organisation, commandement, coordination, contrôle. H. Dunod & E. Pinat.

Floyd, C. B. (2022). Organizational barriers to equity: Stories from Virginia gifted education coordinators. Roeper Review, 44(4), 212–230.

Fraser-Seeto, K. (2013). Pre-service teacher training in gifted and talented education: An Australian perspective. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 3(1), 29–38.

Gagné, F. (2015). Academic talent development programs: A best practices model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 281–295.

Godwin, A., Handsome, O. E., Ayomide, W. A., Enobong, A. E., & Johnson, F. O. (2017). Application of the Henri Fayol principles of management in startup organizations. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 19(10), 78–85.

Goertz, J., Warren, S., & Fennie, K. (1988). The role of art in cognition: A problem-solving approach. Roeper Review, 10(3), 166–167.

Göksu, D. Y., & Geli?li, Y. (2023). Differentiation models for the curriculum of gifted and talented individuals: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(2), 268–279.

Gubbins, E. J., Siegle, D., Ottone-Cross, K., McCoach, D. B., Langley, S. D., Callahan, C. M., Brodersen, A. V., & Caughey, M. (2021). Identifying and serving gifted and talented students: Are identification and services connected? Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(2), 115–131.

Gundara, J. S. (2000). Issues of discrimination in European education systems. Comparative Education, 36(2), 223–234.

Guyadeen, D., Henstra, D., Kaup, S., & Wright, G. (2023). Evaluating the quality of municipal strategic plans. Evaluation and Program Planning, 96.

Hai, P. T. T., Linh, D. N., & Kusakabe, T. (2021). A model for successful professional learning communities to meet the requirement of Vietnam education renovation. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(4), 1–9.

Hainsworth, B. E., & Wilson, L. J. (1992). Strategic program planning. Public Relations Review, 18(1), 9–15.

Hands, L. B. (2023). Edith Cowan University. The Grants Register 2024, 470–472.

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1987). Creativity and learning: What research says to the teacher. National Education Association, Professional Library.

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.

Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2001). The arts and academic achievement: What the evidence shows. Arts Education Policy Review, 102(5), 3–6.

Hicks, D. A. (1999). A four-step methodology for using simulation and optimization technologies in strategic supply chain planning. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Winter Simulation: Simulation---A Bridge to the Future (Vol. 2, pp. 1215–1220).

Hull, D. F., Bull, K. S., Montgomery, D., May, J. R., & O. (2000). Designing an online, introductory gifted education course. Paper, 1, 12.

Jannai, M. E. (2005). Student-text interface in gifted children: Case description. Gifted Education International, 20(2), 200–219.

Jöstl, G., Hinterplattner, S., & Rogl, S. (2023). Talent development programs for secondary schools: Implementation and evaluation of a model school. Education Sciences, 13(12).

Kalaji, G., & Alborno, N. (2023). The influence of gifted and talented programs on students’ self-concept. Athens Journal of Education, 10(3), 507–522.

Kalobo, B. L., & Setlalentoa, W. (2024). Navigating challenges in gifted education: A teacher's perspective on overcoming barriers. Athens Journal of Education, 1–20.

Kettler, T. A. (Ed.). (2021). Modern curriculum for gifted and advanced academic students. Taylor & Francis, July, pp. 91–110.

Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118–121.

Khasawneh, Y. J. A., Alsarayreh, R., Ajlouni, A. A. Al, Eyadat, H. M., Ayasrah, M. N., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2023). An examination of teacher collaboration in professional learning communities and collaborative teaching practices. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(3), 446–452.

Kitano, M. K., & Kirby, D. F. (1986). The unit approach to curriculum planning for the gifted. G/C/T, 2(9), 27–31.

Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15.

Kocaman, B. (2023). The effect of coding education on analytical thinking of gifted students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 95–106.

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277.

Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.

Kozma, R. B., & Johnston, J. (1991). The technological revolution comes to the classroom. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 23(1), 10–23.

Krause, C. S. (1987). A creative arts model for gifted and talented students using community resources and people. Roeper Review, 9(3), 149–152.

Lee, L. (1999). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and talented young children. High Ability Studies, 10(2), 183–196.

Lee, L. E., Meyer, M. S., & Crutchfield, K. (2021). Gifted classroom environments and the creative process: A systematic review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(2), 107–148.

Lloyd, R., & Aho, W. (2020). The four functions of management: An essential guide to management principles.

Lockhart, K., Meyer, M. S., & Crutchfield, K. (2022). A content analysis of selected state plans for gifted and talented education. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(1), 3–42.

Lockhart, K., & Mun, R. U. (2020). Developing a strong home-school connection to better identify and serve culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 43(4), 231–238.

Luo, L., & Kiewra, K. A. (2021). Parents’ roles in talent development. Gifted Education International, 37(1), 30–40.

Luo, S., Kasaei, H., & Schomaker, L. (2020). Accelerating reinforcement learning for reaching using continuous curriculum learning. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

Lupkowski?Shoplik, A. E., & Assouline, S. G. (1994). Evidence of extreme mathematical precocity: Case studies of talented youths. Roeper Review, 16(3), 144–151.

Majid, R. A., Jelas, Z. M., & Ishak, N. M. (2012). Behavioral characteristics prototypes of academically talented students: Implications for educational interventions. Asian Social Science, 8(15), 298.

Majida, R. A., & Alias, A. (2010). Consequences of risk factors in the development of gifted children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 63–69.

Michael-Chadwell, S. (2011). Examining the underrepresentation of underserved students in gifted programs from a transformational leadership vantage point. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 99–130.

Miller, J. V. (1981). Overview of career education for gifted and talented. Journal of Career Development, 7(4), 266–270.

Milne, H. J. O., Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Young adults with Williams Syndrome: Identifying interests. In Reimagining practice: Researching change: Volume 2 (pp. 225–235). Griffith University, School of Cognition, Language and Special Education.

Morgan, T. D. (1993). Technology: An essential tool for gifted & talented education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(4), 358–371.

Muratori, M. C., Stanley, J. C., Ng, L., Ng, J., Gross, M. U. M., Tao, T., & Tao, B. (2006). Insights from SMPY’s greatest former child prodigies: Drs. Terence (“Terry”) Tao and Lenhard (“Lenny”) Ng reflect on their talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(4), 307–324.

Özbek, G., & Erdo?an, K. Ö. S. E. (2022). Matematiksel modelleme yeterlikleri ölçe?i’nin geli?tirilmesi ve psikometrik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi: Özel yetenekliler örneklemi. Ankara Üniversitesi E?itim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel E?itim Dergisi, 1–19.

Parr, J., & Stevens, T. (2020). Challenges of equity and discrimination in the education of gifted children. In Quality education (pp. 67–78). Springer International Publishing.

Penney, S., & Wilgosh, L. (2000). Fostering parent-teacher relationships when children are gifted. Gifted Education International, 14(3), 217–229.

Perry, P. J., & Hoback, J. R. (1984). Grid planning: A tool in programming for talented and gifted students. Roeper Review, 6(3), 139–142.

Peters, S. J. (2022). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82–94.

Petrov, P., Radev, M., Dimitrov, G., & Simeonidis, D. (2022). Infrastructure capacity planning in digitalization of educational services. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(3), 299–306.

Pfeiffer, S. (2002). Identifying gifted and talented students: Recurring issues and promising solutions. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(1), 31–50.

Piske, F. H. R., Stoltz, T., Guérios, E., de Camargo, D., Vestena, C. L. B., de Freitas, S. P., Barby, A. A. de O. M., & Santinello, J. (2017). The importance of teacher training for development of gifted students’ creativity: Contributions of Vygotsky. Online Submission, 8(1), 131–141.

Piske, F. H. R., Stoltz, T., & Machado, J. (2014). Creative education for gifted children. Online Submission, 5, 347–352.

Piske, F. H. R., Stoltz, T., Machado, J. M., Vestena, C. L. B., de Oliveira, C. S. A., De Freitas, S. P., & Machado, C. L. (2016). Working with creativity of gifted students through ludic teaching. Online Submission, 7, 1641–1647.

Qi, H. (2023). Research on the construction of teacher teams in higher vocational colleges. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 6(3), 67–70.

Radaszewski-Byrne, M. (2001). Parents as instructional partners in the education of gifted children: A parent’s perspective. Gifted Child Today, 24(2), 32–42.

Rahayu, T., & Syafril, S. (2018). Cara mensintesiskan literature review dalam penelitian.

Rasheed, M. (2020). Context and content in rural gifted education: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(1), 61–84.

Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1984). Key features of successful programs for the gifted and talented. Educational Leadership, 41(7), 28–34.

Reis, S. M., Renzulli, S. J., & Renzulli, J. S. (2021). Enrichment and gifted education pedagogy to develop talents, gifts, and creative productivity. Education Sciences, 11(10), 615.

Renzulli, J. S. (1990). A practical system for identifying gifted and talented students. Early Child Development and Care, 63(1), 9–18.

Renzulli, J. S. (2003). The three-ring conception of giftedness: Its implications for understanding the nature of innovation. In The international handbook on innovation (pp. 79–96).

Renzulli, J. S. (2016). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. Prufrock Press Inc.

Renzulli, J. S. (2021). The Multiple Menu Model for Developing Differentiated Curriculum 16. In Reflections on gifted education (pp. 211–247). Routledge.

Robinson, A. (2021). An administrators’ association partnership translates to gifted education advocacy. Gifted Child Today, 44(1), 13–19.

Ronksley-Pavia, M. (2023). The fallacy of using the National Assessment Program–Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) data to identify Australian high-potential gifted students. Education Sciences, 13(4), 421.

Rostan, S. M., Pariser, D., & Gruber, H. E. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the development of artistic talent, creativity and giftedness. High Ability Studies, 13(2), 125–155.

Sak, U., & Ayas, B. (2020). EPTS curriculum model: Optimum curriculum differentiator for the education of gifted students. Gifted Education International, 36(2), 154–169.

Sak, U., Sezerel, B. B., Dulger, E., Sozel, K., & Ayas, M. B. (2019). Validity of the Anadolu-Sak Intelligence Scale in the identification of gifted students. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 61(3), 263–283.

Sandmann, L. R., Kiely, R. C., & Grenier, R. S. (2009). Program planning: The neglected dimension of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 15(2), 17–33.

Scott, K. (2023). Differentiation for today’s gifted learners. In Strategies and considerations for educating the academically gifted (pp. 50–73). IGI Global.

Shain, R. A., & Savicky, A. (1979). Planning for the gifted & talented: A model for identification. Roeper Review, 2(4), 30.

Siegle, D. (2017). Technology: Encouraging creativity and problem-solving through coding. Gifted Child Today, 40(2), 117–123.

Sihotang, R. O., & Hutagalung, E. E. (2020). Metacognition skills of the gifted and talented students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 32017.

Smedsrud, J. (2020). Explaining the variations of definitions in gifted education. Nordic Studies in Education, 40(1), 79–97.

Sork, T. J. (2000). Planning educational programs. In Handbook of adult and continuing education (2nd ed.).

Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Assessment of gifted students for identification purposes: New techniques for a new millennium. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 327–336.

Tang, T., Vezzani, V., & Eriksson, V. (2020). Developing critical thinking, collective creativity skills and problem-solving through playful design jams. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100696.

Tirri, K., & Margrain, V. (2023). Identifying and supporting giftedness and talent in schools—Introduction to a special collection of research. Education Sciences, 13(12).

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145.

Troussas, C., Giannakas, F., Sgouropoulou, C., & Voyiatzis, I. (2023). Collaborative activities recommendation based on students’ collaborative learning styles using ANN and WSM. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 54–67.

Van Dinter, R., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2021). Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 136, 106589.

Webber, M., Riley, T., Sylva, K., & Scobie-Jennings, E. (2020). The Ruamano project: Raising expectations, realizing community aspirations and recognizing gifted potential in M?ori boys. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 49(1), 77–88.

Whitton, D. (1997). Regular classroom practices with gifted students in Grades 3 and 4 in New South Wales, Australia. Gifted Education International, 12(1), 34–38.

Winner, E., & Martino, G. (2003). Artistic giftedness. In Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 572–581).

Wood, S., Portman, T. A. A., Cigrand, D. L., & Colangelo, N. (2010). School counselors’ perceptions and experience with acceleration as a program option for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 168–178.

Wood, W. R. (1985). Musical enrichment for the gifted or musically talented student. Roeper Review, 7(4), 242–246.

Worrell, F. C., & Erwin, J. O. (2011). Best practices in identifying students for gifted and talented education programs. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27(4), 319–340.

Zakariyah. (2024). Improving Madrasah competitiveness through excellent Islamic education development strategies. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 140–155.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats